Mount Lucania
5,226 m · Saint Elias Mountains
Remote expedition mountaineering
Saint Elias Mountains · United States / Canada
Highly technical expedition mountaineering at 5,489 metres, with 3,429 metres of topographic prominence.
This visual uses a 0 to 9,000 metre scale so the two measurements can be compared without implying that prominence is part of summit elevation.
Elevation measures summit height above the adopted sea-level reference. Prominence measures the summit’s vertical independence from higher terrain.
Mount Saint Elias stands on the Alaska-Yukon border only a short distance from the Gulf of Alaska. Its summit elevation is lower than Denali or Logan, but the mountain rises extraordinarily steeply from coastal lowlands and glaciers, creating one of the greatest mountain-to-sea relief profiles on Earth. The maritime setting also exposes expeditions to heavy snowfall and rapidly changing storms.
There is no simple trekking-style normal route. Expeditions must manage remote glacier access, crevasses, avalanche terrain, steep snow and ice, and a long commitment far from easy evacuation. The mountain is an especially useful example of why prominence, local relief, latitude and climate matter alongside elevation. A ranking based only on summit metres would badly understate its seriousness.
Mount Saint Elias belongs to the Saint Elias Mountains and is associated with United States / Canada. The summit reaches 5,489 metres above the adopted sea-level reference. Its prominence of 3,429 metres measures the vertical drop that separates the summit from higher terrain.
The prominence figure is about 62% of the summit elevation. That percentage is descriptive rather than a difficulty score. Because the mountain has at least 1,500 metres of prominence, it meets the widely used definition of an ultra-prominent peak.
The summit is high enough for altitude illness to affect unacclimatized visitors, even when the normal route is technically moderate.
Summit elevation alone does not reveal how quickly a person gains height. A road, cableway, hut, base camp or approach valley can place two climbers on very different acclimatization schedules even when they aim for the same summit. A useful itinerary therefore tracks sleeping elevation and ascent rate across several days.
Routes rise through enormous glaciated relief from near sea level and combine remote glacier travel, steep snow and ice, avalanche exposure and severe coastal weather.
The site classifies the usual activity as Highly technical expedition mountaineering. That label describes the broad style of travel rather than assigning a universal grade. Local grading systems, route variants and conditions can change the practical difficulty substantially.
Glaciated terrain adds considerations that elevation figures cannot show. Crevasse exposure, snow bridges, rope-team movement, glacier recession and seasonal changes can alter the line from one year to another. Current route information should come from local authorities, guides or recent route reports.
The local season dataset associates Mount Saint Elias with May, June. Late spring and early summer are the established expedition period.
These months describe common planning windows rather than guaranteed conditions. Seasonal patterns can shift, and individual days can differ sharply from the long-term norm. Check current weather, snowpack, volcanic status where relevant, park notices and route conditions close to the date of travel.
Cross-border geography, protected areas and expedition access require careful current planning with the relevant US and Canadian authorities.
Access rules can distinguish between day visits, overnight stays, trekking, technical climbing, protected zones, local guide requirements and expedition permits. A historical guidebook or an old trip report can therefore be useful for route context while still being unsuitable as the final source for current entry rules.
Three comparisons answer different questions. Elevation helps compare altitude exposure. Prominence helps compare topographic independence. Route descriptions help compare the skills, hazards and commitment involved. A lower mountain can demand more technical climbing than a higher one, while a technically moderate route can become serious through altitude, remoteness or severe weather.
Compare Mount Saint Elias with other mountains
These questions turn the profile into a starting point for research. They do not replace a current route description, local safety advice or professional instruction where technical skills are required.
This page establishes the mountain’s identity, elevation, prominence, broad route character, common seasonal window and permit context. It also explains which parts of that information remain stable and which parts can change. The page does not claim that a common season is a safe season, that a normal route is easy, or that a permit summary remains current indefinitely.
For time-sensitive decisions, verify access and conditions with the responsible park, government, expedition authority or other primary local source. The methodology page explains the source hierarchy and update policy.
These profiles are selected from the local dataset because they share the same range, continent, activity style or a similar summit elevation. The links provide useful comparisons without implying that the routes are equivalent.
Giant Mountains separates stable geographic facts from changing operational information. The site records source information for factual datasets and licensed photography, while permit and closure information should be checked again before travel.