Mount Sinai
2,285 m · Sinai Mountains
Mountain hiking
Cape Fold Belt · South Africa
Mountain hiking, scrambling and rock climbing at 1,085 metres, with 1,055 metres of topographic prominence.
This visual uses a 0 to 9,000 metre scale so the two measurements can be compared without implying that prominence is part of summit elevation.
Elevation measures summit height above the adopted sea-level reference. Prominence measures the summit’s vertical independence from higher terrain.
Table Mountain rises immediately behind Cape Town and forms one of the world's most recognisable urban mountain landscapes. Its flat summit plateau is built largely from resistant sandstone above older granite, with dramatic cliffs falling toward the city and Atlantic seaboard. The mountain belongs to the Cape Floristic Region, whose exceptional plant diversity gives the massif ecological importance far beyond its modest elevation.
A cableway makes the summit accessible to many visitors, but that convenience can obscure the seriousness of hiking elsewhere on the massif. Routes range from established paths to exposed scrambles and major rock climbs. Strong wind, summer heat and the sudden arrival of the tablecloth cloud can transform conditions quickly. Table Mountain therefore demonstrates why elevation alone is a poor measure of mountain character: local relief, weather, route complexity and ecological setting can make a 1,085-metre summit globally significant.
Table Mountain belongs to the Cape Fold Belt and is associated with South Africa. The summit reaches 1,085 metres above the adopted sea-level reference. Its prominence of 1,055 metres measures the vertical drop that separates the summit from higher terrain.
The prominence figure is about 97% of the summit elevation. That percentage is descriptive rather than a difficulty score. The mountain does not reach the 1,500-metre threshold used for the site’s ultra-prominent peak collection.
The summit elevation is lower than the major high-altitude expedition ranges, so route conditions, weather, exposure and terrain may matter more than hypoxia for many visitors.
Summit elevation alone does not reveal how quickly a person gains height. A road, cableway, hut, base camp or approach valley can place two climbers on very different acclimatization schedules even when they aim for the same summit. A useful itinerary therefore tracks sleeping elevation and ascent rate across several days.
Popular paths reach the upper plateau, while other lines involve exposed scrambling or technical rock climbing. Dense cloud can remove visibility quickly, and steep cliffs make navigation errors consequential.
The site classifies the usual activity as Mountain hiking, scrambling and rock climbing. That label describes the broad style of travel rather than assigning a universal grade. Local grading systems, route variants and conditions can change the practical difficulty substantially.
The local dataset does not classify the usual route as a glacier route. That does not remove mountain hazards. Snow, ice, wet rock, loose terrain, lightning, heat, wind or route-finding problems can still change the seriousness of an ascent.
The local season dataset associates Table Mountain with March, April, May, September, October, November. Spring and autumn often provide milder hiking conditions, but wind, heat, cloud and rain can change rapidly in every season.
These months describe common planning windows rather than guaranteed conditions. Seasonal patterns can shift, and individual days can differ sharply from the long-term norm. Check current weather, snowpack, volcanic status where relevant, park notices and route conditions close to the date of travel.
Much of the massif lies within Table Mountain National Park. Route-specific closures, fire restrictions and conservation rules should be checked with SANParks before setting out.
Access rules can distinguish between day visits, overnight stays, trekking, technical climbing, protected zones, local guide requirements and expedition permits. A historical guidebook or an old trip report can therefore be useful for route context while still being unsuitable as the final source for current entry rules.
Three comparisons answer different questions. Elevation helps compare altitude exposure. Prominence helps compare topographic independence. Route descriptions help compare the skills, hazards and commitment involved. A lower mountain can demand more technical climbing than a higher one, while a technically moderate route can become serious through altitude, remoteness or severe weather.
Compare Table Mountain with other mountains
These questions turn the profile into a starting point for research. They do not replace a current route description, local safety advice or professional instruction where technical skills are required.
This page establishes the mountain’s identity, elevation, prominence, broad route character, common seasonal window and permit context. It also explains which parts of that information remain stable and which parts can change. The page does not claim that a common season is a safe season, that a normal route is easy, or that a permit summary remains current indefinitely.
For time-sensitive decisions, verify access and conditions with the responsible park, government, expedition authority or other primary local source. The methodology page explains the source hierarchy and update policy.
These profiles are selected from the local dataset because they share the same range, continent, activity style or a similar summit elevation. The links provide useful comparisons without implying that the routes are equivalent.
Giant Mountains separates stable geographic facts from changing operational information. The site records source information for factual datasets and licensed photography, while permit and closure information should be checked again before travel.