Mount Assiniboine
3,618 m · Canadian Rockies
Technical alpine climbing
Teton Range · United States
Technical alpine climbing at 4,199 metres, with 1,990 metres of topographic prominence.

This visual uses a 0 to 9,000 metre scale so the two measurements can be compared without implying that prominence is part of summit elevation.
Elevation measures summit height above the adopted sea-level reference. Prominence measures the summit’s vertical independence from higher terrain.
Grand Teton is the highest summit of Wyoming’s Teton Range and rises abruptly above Jackson Hole. The range lacks a broad eastern foothill belt, so the mountain’s relief is immediately visible from the valley. Its sharp ridges and exposed rock distinguish it from the broad volcanic cones of the Cascades and make the summit fundamentally a climbing objective rather than a high hiking destination.
Classic routes such as the Owen-Spalding and Upper Exum Ridge involve exposed terrain where a fall can have severe consequences. Difficulty varies substantially between routes, and descent requires the same attention as ascent. Afternoon thunderstorms are an important summer concern because the upper mountain offers little shelter. Grand Teton demonstrates why a relatively moderate elevation can still correspond to serious technical and environmental demands.
Grand Teton belongs to the Teton Range and is associated with United States. The summit reaches 4,199 metres above the adopted sea-level reference. Its prominence of 1,990 metres measures the vertical drop that separates the summit from higher terrain.
The prominence figure is about 47% of the summit elevation. That percentage is descriptive rather than a difficulty score. Because the mountain has at least 1,500 metres of prominence, it meets the widely used definition of an ultra-prominent peak.
The summit reaches an elevation where some visitors can develop altitude symptoms, particularly after a rapid ascent from low elevation.
Summit elevation alone does not reveal how quickly a person gains height. A road, cableway, hut, base camp or approach valley can place two climbers on very different acclimatization schedules even when they aim for the same summit. A useful itinerary therefore tracks sleeping elevation and ascent rate across several days.
Even the classic easier summit routes involve exposed scrambling or roped rock climbing, route finding and significant descent management; harder technical routes cover major faces and ridges.
The site classifies the usual activity as Technical alpine climbing. That label describes the broad style of travel rather than assigning a universal grade. Local grading systems, route variants and conditions can change the practical difficulty substantially.
The local dataset does not classify the usual route as a glacier route. That does not remove mountain hazards. Snow, ice, wet rock, loose terrain, lightning, heat, wind or route-finding problems can still change the seriousness of an ascent.
The local season dataset associates Grand Teton with July, August, September. Mid-summer through early autumn is the established rock-climbing period, subject to storms and snow.
These months describe common planning windows rather than guaranteed conditions. Seasonal patterns can shift, and individual days can differ sharply from the long-term norm. Check current weather, snowpack, volcanic status where relevant, park notices and route conditions close to the date of travel.
Park backcountry camping and bivouac requirements depend on itinerary; climbers should check current Grand Teton National Park regulations.
Access rules can distinguish between day visits, overnight stays, trekking, technical climbing, protected zones, local guide requirements and expedition permits. A historical guidebook or an old trip report can therefore be useful for route context while still being unsuitable as the final source for current entry rules.
Three comparisons answer different questions. Elevation helps compare altitude exposure. Prominence helps compare topographic independence. Route descriptions help compare the skills, hazards and commitment involved. A lower mountain can demand more technical climbing than a higher one, while a technically moderate route can become serious through altitude, remoteness or severe weather.
Compare Grand Teton with other mountains
These questions turn the profile into a starting point for research. They do not replace a current route description, local safety advice or professional instruction where technical skills are required.
This page establishes the mountain’s identity, elevation, prominence, broad route character, common seasonal window and permit context. It also explains which parts of that information remain stable and which parts can change. The page does not claim that a common season is a safe season, that a normal route is easy, or that a permit summary remains current indefinitely.
For time-sensitive decisions, verify access and conditions with the responsible park, government, expedition authority or other primary local source. The methodology page explains the source hierarchy and update policy.
These profiles are selected from the local dataset because they share the same range, continent, activity style or a similar summit elevation. The links provide useful comparisons without implying that the routes are equivalent.
Giant Mountains separates stable geographic facts from changing operational information. The site records source information for factual datasets and licensed photography, while permit and closure information should be checked again before travel.