Mount Feathertop
1,922 m · Victorian Alps
Mountain hiking and winter mountaineering
Central Highlands · Australia
Mountain hiking at 1,617 metres, with 1,617 metres of topographic prominence.
This visual uses a 0 to 9,000 metre scale so the two measurements can be compared without implying that prominence is part of summit elevation.
Elevation measures summit height above the adopted sea-level reference. Prominence measures the summit’s vertical independence from higher terrain.
Mount Ossa is the highest mountain in Tasmania and rises within the island's Central Highlands. It sits amid the glacially shaped landscapes of Cradle Mountain-Lake St Clair National Park, where lakes, dolerite cliffs, moorland and rapidly changing weather create a distinctive alpine environment despite the modest absolute elevation.
Most walkers approach Ossa from the Overland Track and make a side ascent over rough rock to the summit. Low cloud can erase navigation cues, while wind, rain and snow are possible even outside winter. Ossa is a useful reminder that elevation should always be interpreted relative to latitude, climate and local weather rather than treated as a universal measure of mountain seriousness.
Mount Ossa belongs to the Central Highlands and is associated with Australia. The summit reaches 1,617 metres above the adopted sea-level reference. Its prominence of 1,617 metres measures the vertical drop that separates the summit from higher terrain.
The prominence figure is about 100% of the summit elevation. That percentage is descriptive rather than a difficulty score. Because the mountain has at least 1,500 metres of prominence, it meets the widely used definition of an ultra-prominent peak.
The summit elevation is lower than the major high-altitude expedition ranges, so route conditions, weather, exposure and terrain may matter more than hypoxia for many visitors.
Summit elevation alone does not reveal how quickly a person gains height. A road, cableway, hut, base camp or approach valley can place two climbers on very different acclimatization schedules even when they aim for the same summit. A useful itinerary therefore tracks sleeping elevation and ascent rate across several days.
The summit is normally reached as a side trip from the Overland Track. The route is non-technical in good conditions but involves rough boulder terrain and can become hazardous in cloud, wind, rain or snow.
The site classifies the usual activity as Mountain hiking. That label describes the broad style of travel rather than assigning a universal grade. Local grading systems, route variants and conditions can change the practical difficulty substantially.
The local dataset does not classify the usual route as a glacier route. That does not remove mountain hazards. Snow, ice, wet rock, loose terrain, lightning, heat, wind or route-finding problems can still change the seriousness of an ascent.
The local season dataset associates Mount Ossa with December, January, February, March. Austral summer and early autumn are generally the most practical periods, though Tasmanian alpine weather is highly variable.
These months describe common planning windows rather than guaranteed conditions. Seasonal patterns can shift, and individual days can differ sharply from the long-term norm. Check current weather, snowpack, volcanic status where relevant, park notices and route conditions close to the date of travel.
The mountain lies within Cradle Mountain-Lake St Clair National Park and current Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service access rules apply.
Access rules can distinguish between day visits, overnight stays, trekking, technical climbing, protected zones, local guide requirements and expedition permits. A historical guidebook or an old trip report can therefore be useful for route context while still being unsuitable as the final source for current entry rules.
Three comparisons answer different questions. Elevation helps compare altitude exposure. Prominence helps compare topographic independence. Route descriptions help compare the skills, hazards and commitment involved. A lower mountain can demand more technical climbing than a higher one, while a technically moderate route can become serious through altitude, remoteness or severe weather.
Compare Mount Ossa with other mountains
These questions turn the profile into a starting point for research. They do not replace a current route description, local safety advice or professional instruction where technical skills are required.
This page establishes the mountain’s identity, elevation, prominence, broad route character, common seasonal window and permit context. It also explains which parts of that information remain stable and which parts can change. The page does not claim that a common season is a safe season, that a normal route is easy, or that a permit summary remains current indefinitely.
For time-sensitive decisions, verify access and conditions with the responsible park, government, expedition authority or other primary local source. The methodology page explains the source hierarchy and update policy.
These profiles are selected from the local dataset because they share the same range, continent, activity style or a similar summit elevation. The links provide useful comparisons without implying that the routes are equivalent.
Giant Mountains separates stable geographic facts from changing operational information. The site records source information for factual datasets and licensed photography, while permit and closure information should be checked again before travel.